An Overview Of How Policy, Rules, And Laws Are Made In A Marxist, Socialist, Globalist World.

authorityresearch.com

An Overview Of How Policies, Rules, And Laws Are Made In A Marxist, Socialist, Globalist World.
(Policies, rules, and laws that now effect you.)
(Personal note.)

by
Dean Gotcher

"For all that is in the world, the lust of the flesh, and the lust of the eyes, and the pride of life, is not of the Father, but is of the world." 1 John 2:16

"The heart is deceitful above all things, and desperately wicked: who can know it?" Jeremiah 17:9

The human heart, perceiving pleasure, i.e., lust as the standard for "good" instead of doing the father's/Father's will (which gets in the way of lust) can not see its hatred toward the father's/Father's authority as being evil, i.e., "wicked," i.e., "desperately wicked" because its lust for pleasure is standing in the way, 'justifying' the hate. (Mark 7:21-23)

"And he said unto them, Ye are they which justify yourselves [your lusts] before men; but God knoweth your hearts: for that which is highly esteemed among men is abomination in the sight of God." Luke 16:15

Men 'justify' their self, i.e., their heart, i.e., their lusts, i.e., their self interest before one another in order to have peace, i.e., in order to have no sense of guilt (a guilty conscience for doing wrong according to established commands, rules, facts, or truth) for their lusting after the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' that the current situation and or people or person (the world) is stimulating, with each other's approval, i.e., affirmation.

"To enjoy the present reconciles us to the actual." (Karl Marx, Critique of Hegel's 'Philosophy of Right')

"Words and actions should help to unite, and not divide, the people." (Mao Zedong)

"Relationships built upon self interests." (Barack Obama)

In other words, according to Karl Marx, Mao Zedong, and Barack Obama, i.e., the Marxist, socialist, globalist it is lust, i.e., what all men have in common that 'reconciles' men to the world, i.e., to one another, i.e., that engenders unity, requiring the negation of the father's/Father's authority (the system itself), i.e., the negation of established commands, rules, facts, and truth (prejudices) that judge, condemn, and/or cast men out for their carnal thoughts and carnal actions ("theory and practice"), i.e., that divides men according to their obeying or disobeying established commands, rules, facts, and truth, i.e., prejudices. 'Justifying' lust, i.e., self interests 'justifies' the removal (negation) of any and all conditions or individuals or groups that judge, condemn, cast out men for their carnal thoughts and carnal actions, i.e., for not doing the father's/Father's will, i.e., for doing wrong and not right according to established commands, rules, facts, and truth.

"The peasantry [the traditional, "middle class" family—forcing their children to do right and not wrong according to established commands, rules, facts, and truth that they have been taught, i.e., told to obey] constantly regenerates the bourgeoisie [the father's/Father's authority system]—in positively every sphere of activity and life." "We must learn how to eradicate all bourgeois habits, customs, and traditions everywhere." (Vladimir Lenin, Left-Wing Communism: an Infantile Disorder An Essential Condition of the Bolsheviks' Success May 12, 1920)

Millions (hundreds of millions) died (and continue to die) violent deaths as a result of this ideology.

"Our aim is not merely to describe prejudice [established commands, rules, facts, and truth that get in the way of lust, i.e., "human nature"] but to explain it in order to help in its eradication.." "The power-relationship between the parents, the domination of the subject's family by the father or by the mother, and their relative dominance in specific areas of life also seemed of importance for our problem." (Theodor Adorno, The Authoritarian Personality)

This is antithetical (in denial) to God's word.

"From whence come wars and fightings among you? come they not hence, even of your lusts that war in your members? Ye lust, and have not: ye kill, and desire to have, and cannot obtain: ye fight and war, yet ye have not, because ye ask not. Ye ask, and receive not, because ye ask amiss, that ye may consume it upon your lusts." James 4:1-3 (Read James chapters 4 and 5 for the total picture.)

"In the dialogic relation of recognizing oneself [ones lust for pleasure and hatred toward restraint] in the other, they experience the common ground of their existence." (Jürgen Habermas, Knowledge & Human Interest, Chapter Three: The Idea of the Theory of Knowledge as Social Theory)

Establishing their self, i.e., their lust of the 'moment' that the world is stimulating as their ground of being, i.e., rejecting the father's/Father's authority system outright, Marxists, socialists, globalists can only 'reason' from their "lust of the flesh," their "lust of the eyes," and their "pride of life," i.e., only from that which is "of the world," turning all who listen to and follow after them against parental authority, i.e., against the father's/Father's authority system.

"The philosophers have only interpreted the world in different ways, the objective however, is change." (Karl Marx, Feuerbach Thesis #11) Inscribed on Karl Marx's tomb (so it must be important).

According to Karl Marx (Mao Zedong, Barack Obama), i.e., the Marxist, socialist, globalist it is children holding to their parent's standards (which differ between families) that causes division between children (the same applies to cultures and nations) whereas it is 'change,' i.e., lust for pleasure that the current situation, people or person is stimulating, i.e., responding in favor to what all children have in common that is the "objective" of life, requiring the negation of that which causes division amongst children (nations), i.e., the negation of parental authority, i.e., the negation of the father's/Father's authority system in the children's thoughts, directly effecting their actions—establishing the child's carnal nature over and therefore against their parent's, i.e., the father's/Father's authority system, i.e., establishing their self, i.e., their self interests over and therefore against having to humble, deny, die to, control, discipline, capitulate their self, i.e., having to set aside (deny) their lusts, i.e., their self interests in order to do their parent's, i.e., the father's/Father's will—making them (man), i.e., lust the center of the world instead of their parents, i.e., the father/Father (God) and their/his/His authority (doing their will instead of having to do the father's/Father's will, which makes them subject to 'continual change' as the current situation and/or people or person before them, i.e., the world 'changes').

"All individuals (organisms) exist in a continually changing world of experience (phenomenal field) of which they are the center." (Carl Rogers, Client-Centered Therapy)

"Individuals move not from a fixity through change to a new fixity [from doing right and not wrong according to established commands, rules, facts, truth, changing their position only when persuaded with facts and truth, i.e., from faith to faith], though such a process is indeed possible [in other words, "We do not want to think about/focus on/accept that way of thinking"]. But [through a] continuum from fixity to changingness [from belief, i.e., faith and obedience (where lust is "repressed") to theory, i.e., opinion (where lust is 'liberated')], from rigid structure to flow [from "What does the father/Father want me to do?" to "What do I want to do?" and "What will 'the group' think?"], from stasis to process [from doing right and not wrong according to established commands, rules, facts, and truth to self (lust) 'justification']." "At one end of the continuum the individual avoids close relationships [with those who are deviant, i.e., doing wrong, disobeying, sinning, i.e., lusting], which are perceived as being dangerous. At the other end he lives openly and freely in relation to the therapist and to others [those doing wrong, disobeying, sinning, i.e., lusting], guiding his behavior on the basis of his immediate experiencing [his lust for pleasure (for lust) and his lust for "the group's" affirmation, 'justifying' his (and their) lusts—'justifying' his (and their) resentment toward anyone inhibiting or blocking his (and their) lust for pleasure, including his (and their) lust for approval from others—'justifying' his (and their) lust]– he has become an integrated process of changingness." "Prior to therapy the person is prone to ask himself, 'What would my parents want me to do?' During the process of therapy the individual come to ask himself, 'What does it mean to me?'" (Carl Rogers, on becoming a person: A Therapist View of Psychotherapy)

According to Karl Marx "It is not individualism [the person humbling, denying, dying to, controlling, disciplining, capitulating his "self" in order to do the father's/Father's will] that fulfills the individual, on the contrary it destroys him. Society [the person's desire for approval from others, requiring him to compromise in order to "get along," i.e., in order to "build relationship"] is the necessary framework through which freedom and individuality ["freedom" from the father's/Father's authority system and "freedom" to "lust" after pleasure without having a guilty conscience (which the father's/Father's authority engenders)] are made realities." (Karl Marx, in John Lewis, The Life and Teachings of Karl Marx) This is antithetical to doing the Father's will, where is person is free from the lusts of the 'moment.' doing the Father's (i.e., the Lord's) will instead, engendering individualism, under God. John 8:1-59

Marxists, socialists, globalists, perceiving their self as being the personification of the children, i.e., "the people," who, like them lust after the carnal pleasures of the moment that the world stimulates, see it as their duty to 'justify' the child's, i.e., "the people's" natural inclination to lust after pleasure, 'justifying' their natural inclination to hate restraint, i.e., to hate parental authority, i.e., to hate the father's/Father's authority system for getting in the way. When you question the Marxist's, socialist's, globalist's actions he will respond with "It in not just about you," really meaning "It is all about me, so I can lust after pleasure without having a guilty conscience, with your affirmation. If you refuse to affirm me, i.e., my lusts or get in my way 'the people' will remove (negate) you (since having 'justifying' their lusts I now 'own' them). It appears I must keep an eye on you from now on for my 'good.'" Marxist, socialist, globalist perceive parental authority—with parent's forcing their children to do right and not wrong according to their (the parents) established commands, rules, facts, and truth, i.e., forcing their children to do as they are told (inhibiting or blocking, i.e., preventing 'change')—as being the root cause of division amongst the children, i.e., "the people," with children ('loyal' to their parents authority) dividing themselves from other children (whose parents commands, rules, facts, and truth differ from theirs). Unity, i.e., "worldly peace and socialist harmony" for the Marxist, socialist, globalist can only be achieved through what all children have in common, i.e., their natural inclination to lust after pleasure and hate restraint—responding in favor to that which is only "of the world," rejecting that which is not, making right and wrong behavior subject to stimulus-response (which initiates and sustains 'change') not subject to what they are told (which goes against their carnal nature), i.e., which gets in the way of the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' that the world is stimulating (which inhibits or blocks, i.e., prevents 'change'). Children, rejecting (questioning, challenging, defying, disregarding, attacking) parental authority, i.e., rejecting the father's/Father's authority system, i.e., rejecting their parents way of thinking and acting, i.e., rejecting holding themselves accountable to established commands, rules, facts, and truth, insisting those under their authority do the same, lusting after the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' that the world is stimulating, hating restraint instead (insisting others do the same) must therefore, according to the Marxist, socialist, globalist become the "objective" of life (the "objective" of education).

We "must develop persons who see non-influencability of private convictions [individuals holding themselves accountable to established commands, rules, facts, and truth, holding others accountable to their (their parent's/God's) standards as well] in joint deliberations as a vice rather than a virtue." (Kenneth Benne, Human Relations in Curriculum Change)

"Building relationship upon self interest," i.e., upon lust, i.e., upon that which is only "of the world," i.e., upon what all children ("the people") have in common is the benchmark (hallmark) of Marxism, socialism, globalism. Instead of starting with the local (in loco parentis), which initiates and sustains the father's/Father's authority system, i.e., doing right and not wrong according to established commands, rules, facts, and truth, i.e., doing what they are told, i.e., doing what the father/Father says, i.e., refusing to compromise for the sake of 'unity,' i.e., for the sake of "relationships" (any change made to position is by persuasion via commands, rules, facts, and truth being preached or taught), Marxists, socialists, globalists start with the general, i.e., with what all children ("the people") have in common, i.e., "the lust of the flesh," "the lust of the eyes," and "the pride of life, " i.e., that which "is not of the Father, but is of the world" only, making everyone subject to their lust for pleasure and their hatred toward restraint, i.e., hatred toward the restrainer, i.e., hatred toward the father's/Father's authority system, making everyone subject to them (the Marxist, socialist, globalist).

"Sense experience must be the basis of all science." "Science is only genuine science when it proceeds from sense experience, in the two forms of sense perception and sensuous need, that is, only when it proceeds from Nature." (Karl Marx, MEGA I/3)

"Experience is, for me, the highest authority." "Neither the Bible nor the prophets, neither the revelations of God can take precedence over my own direct experience." (Rogers) While Carl Rogers included Karl Marx in this list (which I left out) he did so because, to the "transformational" Marxist the agenda was not to just teach, i.e., inculcate Marxism, as "traditional," hard line, National, i.e., "traditional" Communist do (thus retaining the "top-down" father's/Father's authority system) but for the students to "experience" being Marx themselves (to "sense experience" lusting after the things of the world without being judged, condemned, cast out). People think Communism was defeated when the Berlin wall came down when in truth it came down because Communism had succeeded (in overcoming National Communism aka traditional Marxism, i.e., Fascism—which is the same as Nationalism in the eyes of "transformational" Marxists).

Since science can only measure that which is "of the world" the Marxist, socialist, globalist turns to the "scientific method," i.,e., the questioning of what "is" to establish right and wrong behavior, making "the lust of the flesh" (their "sensuous needs"), "the lust of the eyes" (their "sense perception"), and "the pride of life" (their "sense experience") the only means by which to know right from wrong behavior (known as "behavior science").

"Only when the immediate interests [lusts, i.e., self interests] are integrated into a total view and related to the final goal of the process [as the result of the dialoguing of opinions to a consensus process] do they become revolutionary [overthrowing the father's/Father's authority system in the thoughts of those establishing policy, rules, and laws, making policy, rules, and laws subject only to their carnal nature (lust) and the world that stimulates it]." (György Lukács, History & Class Consciousness: What is Orthodox Marxism?)

"Revolutionary violence [overthrow of the father/Father and his/His authority, i.e., the father's/Father's authority system] reconciles the disunited parties [the children/"the people"] by abolishing the alienation of class antagonism [the father's/Father's authority over the children/"the people"] that set in with the repression of initial morality [lust]. … the revolution that must occur is the reaction of suppressed life [hatred toward restraint, i.e., toward authority], which will visit the causality of fate upon the rulers [the parents, the property owner, the business owner, etc., i.e., the father]. It is those who establish such domination and defend positions of power of this sort who set in motion the causality of fate [hate and violence toward them], divide society into social classes [parents over children, owners over workers, God over man, etc.,], suppress justified interests [lusts], call forth the reactions of suppressed life [hate and violence], and finally experience their just fate in revolution [violence against and overthrow of their right of person (individuality, under God), right of conviction (speech and religion), property, and business]." (Jürgen Habermas)

"The Communist Manifesto makes the point that the bourgeoisie produces its own grave-diggers.'" (Lukács)

For the Marxist, socialist, globalist it is the traditional, "middle-class" family, requiring those under their authority to honor their authority and do as they are told which "produces" children (Marxists, socialists, globalists), dissatisfied with their parent's authority, 'justifying' their "self," i.e., their lusts before one another, who kill their parents (at least not caring what happens to them) for getting in the way of their carnal pleasures, i.e., their lusts of the 'moment' that the world is stimulating.

"No man can serve two masters: for either he will hate the one, and love the other; or else he will hold to the one, and despise the other. Ye cannot serve God and mammon." Matthew 6:24

The only reason for the ideology (fable) of evolution, climate change, etc., i.e., the rejection of Genesis 1-5 is to make the issue of sin, i.e., the need for repentance and salvation moot, so the Marxist, socialist, globalist can sin, i.e., can lust after the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' that the world stimulates and hate, i.e., negate, i.e., remove anyone who gets in the way, including the unborn, the elderly, the innocent, the righteous without having a guilty conscience, i.e., without having any sense of guilt for his or her carnal-wicked thoughts and carnal-wicked actions. This is why Marxists, socialists, globalists are so hostile, i.e., hateful toward the father's/Father's authority system which gets in the way of their, i.e., the child's carnal nature, i.e., their lust for pleasure, which inhibits and/or blocks (judges, condemns, and/or casts out) them, i.e., those who build relationship upon self interest, i.e., upon their lusts of the 'moment' that the current situation and/or people or person is stimulating, i.e., that the world stimulates. Therefore all policies, rules, and laws must be subject to the Marxist's, socialist's, globalist's (they would say "the people's") carnal nature ("human nature"), 'justifying' their lusting after the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' that the world stimulates, establishing lust over and therefore against the father's/Father's authority system, making ever one subject to them, i.e., to their lusts instead. (I say the father's/Father's authority system since, despite the earthly father being of the flesh, i.e., doing wrong, disobeying, sinning, i.e., lusting after the things of the world he has the same structure of office as the Heavenly father, i.e., authoring commands, rules, facts, and truth to be accepted and obeyed, i.e., not to be compromised, enforcing them, requiring those under his/His authority to humble, deny, die to, control, discipline, capitulate their self in order to do his/His will instead of theirs.) It is one or the other, i.e., the father's/Father's authority or the child's carnal nature. The Marxist, socialist, globalist establishes the child's carnal nature, i.e., their lust for pleasure and hatred toward restraint, i.e., that which is only "of the world" as the foundation from which to 'reason' from, thereby 'justifying' their questioning, challenging, defying, denying, attacking the father's/Father's authority system, i.e., for not doing what they are told, i.e., for not doing right and not wrong according to established commands, rules, facts, and truth. It is why the youth are so quickly taken captive to the Marxist, socialist, globalist ideology—their lust for pleasure being 'justified,' 'justifying' their hatred toward the father's/Father's authority system, i.e., their carnal nature.

"There are many stories of the conflict and tension that these new practices are producing between parents and children." (David Krathwohl, Benjamin S. Bloom, Taxonomy of Educational Objectives Book 2: Affective Domain)

All educators are certified and schools accredited today based upon their use of what are called "Bloom's Taxonomies," i.e., Marxist, socialist, globalist curriculum in the classroom. Their "objective," when it comes to right and wrong behavior is to use the classroom as a place (safe place/space/zone), i.e., as a laboratory in which to remove the father's/Father's authority from the students thoughts, making their lust for pleasure and hatred toward restraint, i.e., their carnal nature their only means to knowing right from wrong behavior, turning them against the father's/Father's authority system in the process. Parents, rejecting the father's/Father's authority system, i.e., turning their children over to the Marxist, socialist, globalist, i.e., rejecting their God given authority to train up their children in the admonition of the Lord 'create' a world which God rejects, who turns the parents over to their children's carnal nature, i.e., to their children's lust for pleasure and hatred toward restraint.

"And I will give children to be their princes, and babes shall rule over them. And the people shall be oppressed, every one by another, and every one by his neighbour: the child shall behave himself proudly against the ancient, and the base against the honourable." "As for my people, children are their oppressors, and women rule over them. O my people, they which lead thee cause thee to err, and destroy the way of thy paths." Isaiah 3:4-5, 12 "... and children shall rise up against their parents, and shall cause them to be put to death." Mark 13:12

"Thus saith the LORD, Stand ye in the ways, and see, and ask for the old paths, where is the good way, and walk therein, and ye shall find rest for your souls. But they said, We will not walk therein." Jeremiah 6:16

"Trust in the Lord with all thine heart, and lean not unto thine own understanding. In all thy ways acknowledge him, and he shall direct thy paths." Proverb. 3: 5-6

"For the time will come when they will not endure sound doctrine; but after their own lusts shall they heap to themselves teachers, having itching ears; And they shall turn away their ears from the truth, and shall be turned unto fables." 2 Timothy 4:3, 4

"And even as they did not like to retain God in their knowledge, God gave them over to a reprobate mind, to do those things which are not convenient; Being filled with all unrighteousness, fornication, wickedness, covetousness, maliciousness; full of envy, murder, debate, deceit, malignity; whisperers, Backbiters, haters of God, despiteful, proud, boasters, inventors of evil things, disobedient to parents, Without understanding, covenantbreakers, without natural affection, implacable, unmerciful: Who knowing the judgment of God, that they which commit such things are worthy of death, not only do the same, but have pleasure in them that do them." Romans 1:28-32

"And for this cause [because men, as "children of disobedience," 'justify' their "self," i.e., 'justify' their love of "self" (their lusts), i.e., their love of the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' (dopamine emancipation) which the world stimulates, establishing lust over and therefore against the Father's authority] God shall send them strong delusion, that they should believe a lie [that pleasure is the standard for "good" instead of doing the Father's will]: That they all might be damned who believed not the truth [in the Father and in His Son, Jesus Christ], but had pleasure in unrighteousness [in their "self" and the pleasures of the 'moment,' i.e., lusts which the world stimulates]." 2 Thessalonians 2:11, 12

"Rejoice, O young man, in thy youth; and let thy heart cheer thee in the days of thy youth, and walk in the ways of thine heart, and in the sight of thine eyes: but know thou, that for all these things God will bring thee into judgment." Ecclesiastes 11:9

"Bypassing the traditional channels of 'top-down' decision making [negating the father's/Father's authority system, i.e., establishing policy and rules and/or making laws regarding human behavior, void of the father's/Father's authority system] our objective center's upon transforming public opinion into an effective instrument of global politics [there is no father's/Father's authority in an opinion, in dialogue, or in the consensus process, there is only the participants lusts of the 'moment' (that the current situation and/or people or person is stimulating) being 'justified']." "Individual values must be measured by their contribution to common interests [common lust for pleasure and hatred toward restraint] and ultimately to world interests [to the facilitator of 'change's,' i.e., the Marxist's, socialist's, globalist's lust for pleasure and hatred toward restraint], transforming public consensus into one favorable to the emergence of a stable and humanistic [fatherless/Fatherless, i.e., Godless] world order." "Consensus [negating the father's/Fathers authority when establishing policy and making rules and/or laws makes lust, i.e., the "feelings" of the 'moment' (in the "light" of the current situation or people or person present, i.e., in the "light" of "What can I get out of this situation and/or people or person for my self?" i.e., lust for pleasure and "What will happen to me if they reject and/or turn on me?" i.e., fear of men) the means to determining right and wrong behavior] is both a personal and a political step. It [the negation of the father's/Father's authority system in making policy, rules, and laws, i.e., in determining right and wrong behavior, i.e., the dialoguing of opinions to a consensus process—making "I feel" and "I think," i.e., your opinion the means to knowing right from wrong behavior, instead of being told] is a precondition of all future steps." (Ervin Laszlo, A Strategy For The Future: The Systems Approach to World Order)

"There is a way which seemeth right unto a man, but the end thereof are the ways of death." Proverbs 14:12

"Take heed therefore that the light which is in thee be not darkness." Luke 11:35

". . . for Satan himself is transformed into an angel of light. Therefore it is no great thing if his ministers also be transformed as the ministers of righteousness; whose end shall be according to their works." 2 Corinthians 11:14, 15

"For they being ignorant of God's righteousness, and going about to establish their own righteousness, have not submitted themselves unto the righteousness of God." Romans 10:3

"Wherein in time past ye walked according to the course of this world, according to the prince of the power of the air, the spirit that now worketh in the children of disobedience: Among whom also we all had our conversation in times past in the lusts of our flesh, fulfilling the desires of the flesh and of the mind; and were by nature the children of wrath, even as others." Ephesians 2:2, 3

"Do not err, my beloved brethren. Every good gift and every perfect gift is from above, and cometh down from the Father of lights, with whom is no variableness, neither shadow of turning." James 1:16, 17

The flesh lusts after 'change.' The father's/Father's authority inhibits or blocks change. The only change being your doing the father's/Father's will instead of yours.

" . . . prevent someone who KNOWS from filling the empty space." (Wilfred Bion, ;A Memoir of the Future) In other words, for the Marxist, socialist, globalist the agenda is to prevent the father/Father and his established commands, rules, facts, and truth from entering their thoughts, effecting their actions.

Marxists, socialists, globalists (facilitators of 'change') establish lust, i.e., their carnal desires of the 'moment,' i.e., their self interest over and therefore against the father's/Father's authority system, i.e., over and therefore against having to humble, deny, die to, control, discipline, capitulate their self in order do right and not wrong according to established commands, rules, facts, and truth. Lusting after the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' that the world stimulates is antithetical to doing the father's/Father's will. One is subjective, i.e., subject to the world that stimulates pleasure (as well as hatred toward anyone inhibiting or blocking it, pleasure that is), engendering stimulus-response, i.e., sense experience as the means to knowing right from wrong behavior, with pleasure being right, i.e., "positive" and the inhibition or blocking of it (equated to pain) as being wrong, i.e., "negative." The other is objective, i.e., subject to the father's/Father's authority, i.e., subject to the father's/Father's established commands, rules, facts, and truth, i.e., subject to being told what is right and what is wrong behavior, engendering a guilty conscience when doing wrong, disobeying, sinning, i.e., when lusting after the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' that the world, i.e., that the current situation and/or people or person is stimulating. When you are "asked" (pressured) to be "positive" and not "negative" in a meeting you are being "pressured" (out of fear of being rejected, left out, and/or attacked by "the group," if you do not go along) to set aside the father's/Father's authority system, i.e., to set aside established commands, rules, facts, and truth for the sake of "human relationship," i.e., for the approval (affirmation) of others, i.e., "the group." Stimulus-response engenders rapid 'change,' in response to the current situation and/or people or person present (imagined or real). The father's/Father's authority inhibits or blocks it, with the individual holding to established commands, rules, facts, and truth he has been told, and has accepted as is, despite the current situation and/or people or person present (imagined or real). The soul KNOWS by being told while the flesh knows by "sense experience," i.e., by that which is "of the world" only. By replacing "I KNOW"—"because my parent's, teachers, boss, minister, etc., told me so (and they would not lie to me)," i.e., discussion and position (which is dependent upon objective truth)—with "I feel" and "I think," i.e., dialogue and opinion (which is dependent upon subjective truth), when it comes to knowing right from wrong behavior, the person's carnal nature replaces (negates) the father's/Father's authority system as the foundation (means) from which to reason from, i.e., from which to establish right and wrong behavior, i.e., policies, rules, and law (with lust being right and the father's/Father's authority system being wrong). The Marxist, socialist, globalist (facilitator of 'change'), making lust the 'drive' of life and its augmentation the 'purpose' establishes lust over and therefore against the father's/Father's authority system, i.e., establishes doing their will over and therefore against doing the father's/Father's will.

"Ye adulterers and adulteresses, know ye not that the friendship of the world is enmity with God? whosoever therefore will be a friend of the world is the enemy of God." James 4:4

"Jurisprudence of terror takes two forms; loosely defined rules which produces unpredictable law, and spontaneous changes in rules to best suit the state [best suit those in power]." (R. W. Makepeace and Croom Helm, Marxist Ideology and Soviet Criminal Law) The soviet is a diverse group of people (which must including the deviant/perverse/immoral), dialoguing their opinions to a consensus (there is no father's/Father's authority in dialogue, in an opinion, or in the consensus process, there is only the participants self interests, i.e., lusts of the 'moment' that the situation and/or people or person is stimulating), over social issues (when social worth becomes a part of the courtroom decision the individual has lost his rights as an individual, under God—the individual has no value outside of social cause), to a pre-determined outcome (that no policy or law be made without the soviet system, i.e., the consensus process, preventing the father's/Father's authority from establishing policy or making law). When policy and law are established according to the self interests of those in authority the victim (whos individual rights were violated by the criminal) becomes the criminal (forcing his laws upon the criminal), who, now becomes the victim—having to obey established laws preventing him from becoming his self (subject to his carnal nature, i.e., to what he has in common with all that is "of the world"). Anyone holding to established commands, rules, facts, and truth placed in a dialoguing of opinions to a consensus environment experiences terror as his individual rights, under God are replaced (negated) with social cause, i.e., social worth (as his soul is replaced with his flesh and the world that stimulates it).

"Every system of law known to civilized society generated from or had as its component one of two well known systems of ethics, stoic or Christian. The COMMON LAW draws its subsistence from the latter, its roots go deep into that system, the Christian concept of right and wrong or right and justice motivates every rule of equity. It is the guide by which we dissolve domestic friction's and the rule by which all legal controversies are settled." (Strauss Vs. Strauss., 3 So. 2nd 727, 728, 1941)

"The justice of state constitutions is to be decided not on the basis of Christianity, not from the nature of Christian society but from the nature of human society." (Karl Marx, Critique of Hegel's 'Philosophy of Right')

"Every grown man of the Ephesians should hang himself and leave the city to the boys." (Heraclitus) Karl Marx, rejecting the father's/Father's authority system built his ideology off of Heraclitus, who's ideology influenced the Stoics.

". . . there has always been strong support for the view that life does not begin until live birth. This was the belief of the Stoics." (ROE v. WADE, 410 U.S. 113 15, 1973)

". . . the central problem is to change reality. . . . reality with its 'obedience to laws'" (Lukács)

"For we know that the law is spiritual: but I am carnal, sold under sin. For that which I do I allow not: for what I would, that do I not; but what I hate, that do I. If then I do that which I would not, I consent unto the law that it is good. Now then it is no more I that do it, but sin that dwelleth in me. For I know that in me (that is, in my flesh,) dwelleth no good thing: for to will is present with me; but how to perform that which is good I find not. For the good that I would I do not: but the evil which I would not, that I do. Now if I do that I would not, it is no more I that do it, but sin that dwelleth in me. I find then a law, that, when I would do good, evil is present with me. For I delight in the law of God after the inward man: But I see another law in my members, warring against the law of my mind, and bringing me into captivity to the law of sin which is in my members. O wretched man that I am! who shall deliver me from the body of this death? I thank God through Jesus Christ our Lord. So then with the mind I myself serve the law of God; but with the flesh the law of sin." Romans 7:14-25

"I had not known sin, but by the law: for I had not known lust, except the law had said, Thou shalt not covet." Roman's 7:7

Being told vs 'discovering' it for your self—the difference between the law of God and the law of the flesh.

"And the LORD God formed man of the dust of the ground, and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life; and man became a living soul." Genesis 2:7

When God "formed" (created) Adam He made him unlike any other living thing in the creation, i.e., He "breathed into his nostrils the breath of life" making him "a living soul." He then "commanded" (told) him what he could and could not do (what He did with no other creature in the creation), i.e., He told him what was right and what was wrong behavior, i.e., which trees he could eat the fruit of and which one he could not (lest he die).

"And the LORD God commanded the man, saying, Of every tree of the garden thou mayest freely eat: But of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil, thou shalt not eat of it: for in the day that thou eatest thereof thou shalt surely die." Genesis 2:16, 17

If you reason from what you have been told, right and wrong are objective, i.e., you are subject to the father's/Father's authority system. If your reason from your self, i.e., from your self interest, i.e., from your lusts, right and wrong are subjective, i.e., you are subject to whoever 'justifies' your carnal nature, i.e., your lust for pleasure and hatred toward restraint, you are subject to the Marxist, socialist, globalist, i.e., the facilitators of 'change.' Your ability to reason comes from God, choosing to either use it to do His will, i.e., do what He commands (reasoning from what you have been told) or do your will, i.e., 'justify' your self (reasoning from, i.e., 'justifying' your lusts of the 'moment' that the world is stimulating instead), something no animal does (it can not be evolved). You have to lower yourself to an animal, i.e., to one of Thorndike's chickens, Skinner's rats, or Pavlov's dog (stimulus-response) in order to participate in the process of 'change,' i.e., in the dialoguing of opinions to a consensus process, i.e., in the dialectic process, i.e., in order to be a Marxist, socialist, globalist. Romans 1:18-32

No animal, which are all subject only to stimulus-response (approach pleasure - avoid pain) and impulses and urges (instincts) can read or write a book, i.e., can be told or tell others what is right and what is wrong behavior, i.e., what they can and can not do. By making man subject to stimulus-response (to only that which is "of the world," i.e., "behavior science," i.e., the "cognitive, affective, and psycho-motor domains," i.e., to man's "lust of the flesh," "lust of the eyes," and "pride of life," i.e., to "only" that which "is of the world"—what Marxists, socialists, globalists do ) man is (deceptively) equated to an animal (approach pleasure and avoid pain) denying the fact that man does what animals can not do, i.e., reason from being told, which requires faith in the one giving him commands, rules, facts, and truth to be accepted and obeyed. For the Marxist, socialist, globalist, i.e., the facilitator of 'change' if man is to "'think' for his self," i.e., is to 'discover' for himself what is right and what is wrong behavior he must "reason" from his perception of what is and what is not in the world before him (as the woman did in the garden in Eden)—with the "help" of the master facilitator of 'change.'

"Now the serpent was more subtle than any beast of the field which the LORD God had made. And he said unto the woman, Yea, hath God said, Ye shall not eat of every tree of the garden? [this is a neurolinguistc construct (an imbedded statement in a question, beginning the process of liberating a person's lust out from under their fear of judgment)—one of the most powerful forms of hypnosis] And the woman said unto the serpent, We may eat of the fruit of the trees of the garden: But of the fruit of the tree which is in the midst of the garden, God hath said, Ye shall not eat of it, neither shall ye touch it [her lust revealed], lest ye die. And the serpent said unto the woman, Ye shall not surely die [removing the "negative," i.e., fear of judgment (which was not a lie regarding the here-and now, i.e., the tree itself did not kill her—or Adam—but a lie regarding the there-and then, with God removing her—and Adam—from having access to the "tree of life," i.e., their inheritance; then after death coming judgment, i.e., eternal life or eternal death)]: For God doth know that in the day ye eat thereof, then your eyes shall be opened, and ye shall be as gods, knowing good and evil. And when the woman saw that the tree was good for food, and that it was pleasant to the eyes, and a tree to be desired to make one wise [evaluating (aufheben) from her senses, i.e., her understanding], she took of the fruit thereof, and did eat, and gave also unto her husband with her; and he did eat." Genesis 3:1-6 emphasis added.

The 'moment' the master facilitator of 'change' got (drew) the woman into dialogue, i.e., into "leaning to her own understanding," regarding right and wrong behavior he "owned" her. (The effect of dialogue, i.e., opinions, when it comes to knowing right from wrong behavior is covered in greater detail below.) By "helping" her to openly share her carnal desire, i.e., her lust of the 'moment' (to "touch" the "Thou shalt not" tree), in a non-judgmental, i.e., "Ye shall not surely die" ("positive") environment he was able to open her mind up to the "possibilities," i.e., to her "full potential." In this way, the woman, dissatisfied with not having what she wanted, taking council from the master facilitator of 'change' became the first "scientist" ("behavioral scientist"), evaluating the situation via her "senses"—establishing "human nature," i.e., what she understood (from her senses), i.e., stimulus-response over and therefore against the "Father's," i.e., God's authority, i.e., over and therefore against being told. Then putting it into praxis, i.e., acting on it (the devil did not "make her do it," i.e., we all choose) she "resolved" the 'crisis,' i.e., "the problem," without God and His Word getting in the way (which, according to those "of and for the world," i.e., the facilitator of 'change,' i.e., the Marxist, socialist, globalist is "the problem"—God and His Word, i.e., the father's/Father's authority system that is). Adam, lusting (following) after the woman instead of obeying the "Father," i.e., instead of doing the "Father's" will likewise established his carnal nature, i.e., "the lust of the flesh," "the lust of the eyes," and "the pride of life" i.e., that which the world stimulates, i.e., stimulus-response as his basis for determining right and wrong behavior. 'Liberated' (in their mind) from the "Father's" authority they became their self without restraint (without the "Father's" authority, i.e., without established commands, rules, facts, and truth getting in the way of their lust), i.e., they become self actualized.

"Self-actualizing people have to a large extent transcended the values of their culture [their parent's/God's authority, i.e., the father's/Father's authority system]. They are not so much merely Americans [nationalists] as they are world citizens, members of the human species ["of and for the world" only] first and foremost." (Abraham Maslow, The Higher Reaches Of Human Nature)

As the woman, with Adam following, abdicated her inheritance (her access to the tree of life) for the pleasures of the 'moment,' the Marxist, socialist, globalists, through identifying what "the people" are lusting after and with the power of taxis (the power to tax is the power to destroy) offer to help them achieve it, they are able to remove the next generations inheritance (from the father, preventing the children from continuing to initiate and sustain the father's authority system into the next generation), so they have to depend upon the government which uses their tax dollars to fund their interest, i.e., to satisfy their lusts, i.e., to support their causes, i.e., to support their "people" (who think and act like them), i.e., to perpetuate (initiate and sustain) the process of 'change' negating the the father's/Father's authority in society in the process, so they can lust without having a guilty conscience, supporting themselves and those who think and act like with the children's inheritance money, i.e., the father's/Father's money. Money, to the Marxist, socialist, globalist is store up pleasure, requiring its remove from the children adhering to the father's/Father's authority in order to prevent the father's/Father's authority from controlling the thoughts, and therefore the actions of the next generation, so they can use it for their own pleasures without having anyone judging, condemning, and casting them out because of their carnal thoughts and carnal actions.

"In a democratic society a patriarchal culture should make us depressed instead of glad; it [a patriarchal culture] is an argument against the higher possibilities of human nature, of self actualization." "In our democratic society, any enterprise―any individual―has its obligations to the whole [to only those who are "of and for the world," 'justifying' lust]." (Abraham Maslow, Maslow On Management)

"Adam and his wife hid themselves from the presence of the LORD God amongst the trees of the garden. . . . I heard thy voice in the garden, and I was afraid, because I was naked; and I hid myself. And he said, Who told thee that thou wast naked?" (excerpts from Genesis 3:8-11) emphasis added. Being told is the father's/Father's means of communication to his children.

Rejecting being told (when it comes to right and wrong behavior, i.e., to what you can and can not do), turning to stimulus-response, i.e., "reasoning" from the flesh leads to sin. The liberal's response is not to admit he is wrong, i.e., is to blame someone else or the situation (the environment) for his "bad" behavior—since there is only stimulus-response (in his mind).

"And the man said, The woman whom thou gavest to be with me, she gave me of the tree, and I did eat. And the LORD God said unto the woman, What is this that thou hast done? And the woman said, The serpent beguiled me, and I did eat." Genesis 3:12, 13

When confronted with their sins, i.e., their lusts they became the first 'liberals.' Instead of showing remorse for their sins and repenting they ('justifying' their self, i.e., their lusts) blamed the situation and someone else for their "bad" behavior, with Adam blaming the woman—"throwing her under the bus" (along with God for creating her, i.e., for creating an "unhealthy environment" for him to live in)—and the woman blaming the Serpent, i.e., the master facilitator of 'change'—"throwing him under the bus" for "helping" her 'justify' her lusts.

For those "of and for the world," i.e., for the Marxist, socialist, globalist instead of reasoning from what you KNOW, i.e., from what you have been told you are to "Reason" from your "senses" that the world stimulates, i.e., from how you "feel" and what you "think" in the 'moment' (according to the flesh, which the situation and/or people are [or tree is] stimulating) making you a god amongst gods (which makes right and wrong behavior subject to your lusts).

"Children, obey your parents in the Lord: for this is right. Honour thy father and mother; which is the first commandment with promise; That it may be well with thee, and thou mayest live long on the earth." Ephesians 6:1-3

Marxists, socialists, globalists are hostile towards the father/Father and his/His authority, i.e., toward the father's/Father's authority system (which authors commands, rules, facts, and truth to be accepted by faith and obeyed, and enforces them, rewarding those who obey while correcting, chastening, or casting out those who disobey). While the Son of God, in obedience to the Father, shed his blood on the cross, redeeming man from his sins, with the Father reconciling man to Himself in His Son's resurrection, so man, after death can spend eternity in His Holiness and Glory. Marxists, socialists, globalists 'redeem' man from the Father, i.e., from the father's/Father's authority system, 'reconciling' him to the world, so he can lust after the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' that the world is stimulating, without having a guilty conscience, i.e., without having any sense of guilt for his doing wrong, disobeying, sinning, i.e., for his lusting after the things "of the world"—resulting in him, after death spending eternity in the lake of fire that is never quenched, prepared for the master facilitator of 'change' and all who follow after him. The gospel is established upon the Son, and those following after Him, doing the Father's will.

"I can of mine own self do nothing: as I hear, I judge: and my judgment is just; because I seek not mine own will, but the will of the Father which hath sent me." "For I have not spoken of myself; but the Father which sent me, he gave me a commandment, what I should say, and what I should speak. And I know that his commandment is life everlasting: whatsoever I speak therefore, even as the Father said unto me, so I speak." John 5:30; 12:47-50

"For whosoever shall do the will of my Father which is in heaven, the same is my brother, and sister, and mother." Matthew 12:50

"Not every one that saith unto me, Lord, Lord, shall enter into the kingdom of heaven; but he that doeth the will of my Father which is in heaven." Matthew 7:21

"And call no man your father upon the earth: for one is your Father, which is in heaven." Matthew 23:9

"Be ye therefore perfect, even as your Father which is in heaven is perfect." Mathew 5:48

"Jesus saith unto him, I am the way, the truth, and the life: no man cometh unto the Father, but by me." John 14:6

"I and my Father are one." John 10:30 "Whosoever therefore shall confess me before men, him will I confess also before my Father which is in heaven. But whosoever shall deny me before men, him will I also deny before my Father which is in heaven." Matthew 10:32, 33 ". . . he that hath seen me hath seen the Father; . . . Believest thou not that I am in the Father, and the Father in me? the words that I speak unto you I speak not of myself: but the Father that dwelleth in me, he doeth the works. Believe me that I am in the Father, and the Father in me: or else believe me for the very works' sake." John 14:9-11 ". . . for my Father is greater than I." John 14:28 "He that hateth me hateth my Father also." John 15:23 ". . . the cup which my Father hath given me, shall I not drink it?" John 18:11 "And he said unto them, How is it that ye sought me? wist ye not that I must be about my Father's business?" "Father, if thou be willing, remove this cup from me: nevertheless not my will, but thine be done." Luke 2:49; 22:42 "And when Jesus had cried with a loud voice, he said, Father, into thy hands I commend my spirit: and having said thus, he gave up the ghost." Luke 23:46 "And I will pray the Father, and he shall give you another Comforter, that he may abide with you for ever; Even the Spirit of truth; whom the world cannot receive, because it seeth him not, neither knoweth him: but ye know him; for he dwelleth with you, and shall be in you." "At that day ye shall know that I am in my Father, and ye in me, and I in you." "But the Comforter, which is the Holy Ghost, whom the Father will send in my name, he shall teach you all things, and bring all things to your remembrance, whatsoever I have said unto you." "for if I go not away, the Comforter will not come unto you; but if I depart, I will send him unto you." John 14:16, 17, 20, 26, John 16:7

"... it is not in man that walketh to direct his steps." Jeremiah 10:23

"And ye have forgotten the exhortation which speaketh unto you as unto children, My son, despise not thou the chastening of the Lord, nor faint when thou art rebuked of him: For whom the Lord loveth he chasteneth, and scourgeth every son whom he receiveth. If ye endure chastening, God dealeth with you as with sons; for what son is he whom the father chasteneth not? But if ye be without chastisement, whereof all are partakers, then are ye bastards, and not sons. Furthermore we have had fathers of our flesh which corrected us, and we gave them reverence: shall we not much rather be in subjection unto the Father of spirits, and live? For they verily for a few days chastened us after their own pleasure; but he for our profit, that e might be partakers of his holiness. Now no chastening for the present seemeth to be joyous, but grievous: nevertheless afterward it yieldeth the peaceable fruit of righteousness unto them which are exercised thereby." Hebrews 12:5-11

While dad (your earthly father) is not perfect—he may be (or might have been) a down right tyrant (or MIA/AWOL), thinking and acting as a child, "lusting . . ." without restraint—his office of authority is perfect, having been given to him by God (the Heavenly Father), who is perfect in which to do His will.

"Little children, it is the last time: and as ye have heard that antichrist shall come, even now are there many antichrists; whereby we know that it is the last time." "[H]e is antichrist, that denieth the Father and the Son." 1 John 2:18, 22

It is the father's/Father's authority system itself that the Marxist, socialist, globalist is out to negate, removing it from the environment so he can do wrong, disobey, sin, i.e., lust after the things "of the world" without having a guilty conscience, i.e., without having any fear of being held accountable (judged, condemned, cast out) for his carnal/wicked thoughts and actions.

"Once the earthly family is discovered to be the secret of the Holy family, the former must then itself be destroyed [vernichtet, i.e., annihilated, i.e., negated] in theory and in practice." (Karl Marx, Feuerbach Thesis #4)

Making "What can I get out of this situation, people, or person for my self?" i.e., self interest, i.e., lust as the 'drive' and its augmentation the 'purpose' of life, makes "What will happen to me if they reject and/or turn on me?" i.e., fear of man the outcome, resulting in "What will the group think?" (socialism) controlling a person's thoughts, directly effecting his actions.

"Protestantism [the priesthood of all believers, doing your best as unto the Lord, putting no man between you and the Lord] was the strongest force in the extension of cold rational individualism." (Max Horkheimer, Vernunft and Selbsterhaltung; English. Reasoning and Self Preservation) It is the father's/Father's authority system that engenders individualism (under God).

The praxis of psychology has the same agenda.

"'It is not really a decisive matter whether one has killed one's father or abstained from the deed,' if the function of the conflict and its consequences are the same [the husband/father no longer exercises his God given authority in the home]." "The hatred against patriarchal suppression—a 'barrier to incest,' . . . the desire (for the sons) to return to the mother culminates in the rebellion of the exiled sons, the collective killing and devouring of the father." (Sigmund Freud in Herbert Marcuse, Eros and Civilization: a psychological inquiry into Freud)

Sigmund Freud's history of the prodigal son is not of the son coming to his senses, humbling his self, returning home, submitting his self to his father's authority, learning his inheritance was not his father's money but his father's love for him (Luke 15:11-24), but of the son (cast out by the father for his immoral (perverse) behavior) joining with his "friends," returning home, killing the father, taking all that was his (the father's), using it to satisfy their carnal desires, i.e., their "lusts," killing all the fathers in the land so all the children could be the same, i.e., like them, thereby affirming them, i.e., their "incest," 'justifying' and supporting their control over them, living off their labor.

"According to Freud, the ultimate essence of our being is erotic." "Eros is fundamentally a desire for union with objects in the world." "Eros is the foundation of morality." "Freud saw that in the id there is no negation [no parental authority, i.e., no Godly restraint, i.e., no "can not," "must not," "Thou shalt not"], only affirmation and eternity [only the people's/children's natural inclination to "lust . . ."]." "Children have not acquired that sense of shame which, according to the Biblical story, expelled mankind from Paradise, and which, presumably, would be discarded if Paradise were regained [if "lusting . . ." becomes the agenda, i.e., the 'drive' and 'purpose' of life]." "The repression of normal adult sexuality is required only by cultures which are based on patriarchal domination [on doing the father's/Father's will]." "Our repressed desires are the desires we had unrepressed, in childhood; and they are sexual desires." "Parental discipline, religious denunciation of bodily pleasure, . . . have all left man overly docile, but secretly in his unconscious [in his urges and impulses of the 'moment' which are being stimulated by the world] unconvinced, and therefore neurotic [caught between his desire for parental approval and his lust for the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' that the world is stimulating, having a guilty conscience for thinking about or doing the latter]." "The foundation on which the man of the future will be built is already there, in the repressed unconscious; the foundation has to be recovered ['liberated' from the guilty conscience, requiring the negation of the father's/Father's authority]." (Norman O. Brown, Life Against Death: The Psychoanalytical Meaning of History)

"Marxian theory [society] needs Freudian-type instinct theory [man's natural inclination "lust . . ."] to round it out. And of course, vice versa." "Third-Force psychology is also epi-Marxian in these senses, i.e., including the most basic scheme as true-good social conditions ['liberation' of "self," i.e., lust from the father's/Father's authority] are necessary for personal growth, bad social conditions [submission of "self" to the father's/Father's authority] stunt human nature,. . . This is to say, one could reinterpret Marx into a self-actualization-fostering Third- and Fourth-Force psychology-philosophy. And my impression is anyway that this is the direction in which they are going now." (Abraham Maslow, The Journals of Abraham Maslow)

The facilitator of 'change,' i.e., the Marxist, socialist, globalist establishes "human nature," i.e., "the lust of the flesh, and the lust of the eyes, and the pride of life," i.e., only that which is "of the world" over and therefore against the father's/Father's authority in order for him to lust after the carnal pleasures of the moment (dopamine emancipation) that the current situation and/or the people or person is stimulating without having a guilty conscience (which the father's/Father's authority engenders), with "the people's" or "the person's" affirmation, i.e., approval. Perceiving his self as being the personification of "the people," who, like him lust after the carnal pleasures of the moment that the world stimulates, he sees it as his duty to 'justify' "the people's" natural inclination to lust, in order to 'justify' his natural inclination to lust, 'justifying,' in his mind his hatred toward and negation of (violence toward) the father's/Father's authority for getting in the way.

In dialogue we 'justify' our carnal desires, i.e., our feelings, i.e., our lusts. In discussion we hold to our position, changing it only when persuasion with facts or truth.

"In an ordinary discussion people usually hold relatively fixed positions and argue in favour of their views as they try to convince others to change." (Bohm and Peat, Science, Order, and Creativity)

Discussion emanates from established commands, rules, facts, and truth. Discussion divides upon either being/doing right or being/doing wrong according to established commands, rules, facts, and truth, i.e., KNOWING from being told, which is formal, i.e., judgmental. The father/Father retains his authority in discussion, i.e., has the final say, i.e., "Because I said so," "Never the less," "It is written." Majority vote retains the father's/Father's authority system although the father might lose out on the particular issue at hand.

". . . prevent someone who KNOWS from filling the empty space." (Wilfred Bion, A Memoir of the Future)

The facilitator of 'change,' i.e., the Marxist, socialist, globalist on the other hand focus upon the student's (and his) "feelings," making commands, rules, facts, and truth subject to his "sense experiences" of the past and the present, i.e., to his "sensuous needs" ("lust of the flesh") and "sense perception" ("lust of the eyes") i.e., to his natural inclination to "lust . . .." If the student has any questions regarding right and wrong behavior the facilitator of change, i.e., the Marxist, socialist, globalist goes to dialogue, i.e., to the student's "feelings" and "thoughts" of the 'moment' that the current situation and or people or person is stimulating in order to 'liberate' the student (and himself) from the father's/Father's authority system. In discussion students tend to hold to their parents position, causing division between one another based upon their parents established commands, rules, facts, and truth. In dialogue student's build relationship upon what they have in common, i.e., their natural inclination to lust after the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' that the world stimulate as well as their natural inclination to hate restraint.

"A dialogue is essentially a conversation between equals." "The spirit of dialogue, is in short, the ability to hold many points of view in suspension, along with a primary interest in the creation of common meaning." (Bohm and Peat, Science, Order, and Creativity)

Dialogue emanates from the child's (and the facilitator of 'change's, i.e., the Marxist, socialist, globalist) "feelings," i.e., from his "I feel" and/or "I think," i.e., from his opinion, which is informal, i.e., non-judgmental. The child (and the facilitator of 'change,' i.e., the Marxist, socialist, globalist) retains his carnal nature in dialogue, i.e., has the final say against authority, i.e., against absolutes that get in the way of his natural inclination to "lust . .," i.e., against the father's/Father's authority (system). There is no father's/Father's authority in dialogue, in an opinion, or in the consensus process. There is only the child's (and the facilitator of 'change's,' i.e., the Marxist's, socialist's, globalist's) natural inclination to "lust . . ." being 'justified.' Dialogue moves opinions to a consensus, negating the father's/Father's authority and the guilty conscience it engenders in the process.

At a buffet you discuss with your self and/or others what is good for you to eat and what is not good for you to eat. You dialogue with your self and/or with others what you like and do not like. If you want to eat something that you like, that is bad for you to eat you dialogue with your self and/or with others. If you discuss it with your self and/or with others you will more than likely not eat it. By bringing dialogue ("I feel" and "I think") into a environment establishing what is right and what is wrong behavior the father's/Father's authority, i.e., "obedience to law," i.e., doing right and not wrong according to established commands, rules, facts, and truth is negated. What You Lose In Dialogue.

Twenty students, for example, from twenty different homes, with father's who disagree with/differ from one another on personal-social issue (regarding right and wrong behavior) results in twenty students, holding onto their father's position (authority) refusing to get along with one another when it comes to right and wrong behavior (personal-social issues). By switching ("shifting") communication, i.e., curriculum in the classroom from the preaching, teaching, and discussing of established commands, rules, facts, and truth, which are to be learned by faith and obeyed as given, which retains the father's/Father's authority system to the students dialoguing their opinions, i.e., their carnal desires (lusts) of the 'moment,' that the world, i.e., that the current situation and/or students are stimulating to a common "feeling" of agreement (at least tolerance), i.e., to a consensus, unity negates division.

This is why facilitators of 'change,' i.e., Marxists, socialists, globalists move communication, regarding right and wrong behavior away from discussion, i.e., away from what they and others are told, to dialogue, i.e., to how they and others feel so they can do wrong, disobey, sin, i.e., lust without having a guilty conscience. The guilty conscience is engendered from the father's/Father's authority system, i.e., from having to do right and not wrong according to established commands, rules, facts, and truth.

"The guilty conscience is formed in childhood by the incorporation of the parents and the wish to be father of oneself." "What we call 'conscience' perpetuates inside of us our bondage to past objects now part of ourselves:'" (Brown) A definition of the guilty conscience from a Marxist's perspective.

"The personal conscience is the key element in ensuring self-control, refraining from deviant behavior even when it can be easily perpetrated." "The family, the next most important unit affecting social control, is obviously instrumental in the initial formation of the conscience and in the continued reinforcement of the values that encourage law abiding behavior." (Dr. Robert Trojanowicz, The meaning of "Community" in Community Policing)

By simply moving communication away from discussion (away from that which is "negative"—to the flesh) to dialogue (to that which is "positive"—to the flesh), when it comes to right and wrong behavior, the father's/Father's authority is negated in the participants thoughts, directly effecting their actions, turning them against anyone who insists upon discussion, i.e., established commands, rules, facts, and truth in solving social-personal issues.

"The negative valence of a forbidden object which in itself attracts the child [the guilty conscience] thus usually derives from an induced field of force of an adult." "If this field of force loses its psychological existence for the child (e.g., if the adult goes away or loses his authority) the negative valence also disappears." (Kurt Lewin, A Dynamic Theory of Personality)

"Not feeling at home in the sinful world, Critical Criticism must set up a sinful world in its own home." "Critical Criticism is a spiritualistic lord, pure spontaneity, actus purus, intolerant of any influence from without." (Karl Marx, The Holy Family)

In dialogue (what Karl Marx called "Critical Criticism") we are god ("a spiritualistic lord, pure spontaneity, actus purus, intolerant of any influence from without."), making law (right and wrong behavior) subject to our carnal desires (lusts) of the 'moment' that the world is stimulating. In dialogue, "hell, fire, and damnation," i.e., God's judgment upon the sinner, i.e., upon "the children of disobedience," i.e., upon the Marxist, socialist, globalist is replaced with "I am OK." "You are OK." 'justifying' your and his lusts of the 'moment' that the world is stimulating so he can sin "in a sinful world" and "feel at home" (hating and removing anyone making him "not feeling at home").

"Words and actions should help to unite, and not divide, the people." (Mao Zedong)

Unity is the result of the citizen's identifying with what they have in common, i.e., their natural inclination to lusts after the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' that the world stimulates and hate restrain. Division is the result of the citizens remaining loyal to the father's/Father's authority, dividing them from one another according to the established commands, rules, facts, and truth they have accepted as is, holding others accountable to them as well.

"In the dialogic relation of recognizing oneself [ones lust for pleasure and hatred toward restraint] in the other, they experience the common ground of their existence [only that which is "of the world"]." (Jürgen Habermas)

"The heart is deceitful above all things [thinking pleasure, i.e., lust is the standard for "good" instead of doing the father's/Father's will], and desperately wicked [hating anyone preventing, i.e., inhibiting or blocking it from enjoying the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' it lusts after]: who can know it?" Jeremiah 17:9 It can not see its hatred toward the father's/Father's authority as being evil, i.e., "wicked," i.e., "desperately wicked" because its lust for pleasure is standing in the way, 'justifying' the hate. (Mark 7:21-23)

Establishing policy, rules, and law via the consensus process negates the father's/Father's authority in the outcome. To participate is to guarantee the outcome, i.e., Marxism, socialism, globalism—the outcome is the participation. It is not the issue (crises) at hand that is the issue. It is the process being used to solve it. When you question the facilitator of 'change's,' i.e., the Marxist's, socialist's, globalist's actions he will respond with "It in not just about you," really meaning "It is all about me, so I can lust after pleasure without having a guilty conscience, with your affirmation. If you refuse to affirm me, i.e., my lusts or get in my way 'the people' will remove (negate) you (since having 'justifying' their lusts I now 'own' them). It appears I must keep an eye on you from now on for my 'good.'" The meaning of "sight based management."

"To enjoy the present reconciles us to the actual." (Karl Marx, Critique of Hegel's 'Philosophy of Right')

In other words lust, i.e., enjoying the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' that the world, i.e., the current situation and/or people are stimulating, over and therefore against the father/Father's authority that gets in the way reconciles man to the world. Self is actualized in lust and the world that stimulates it. Immanuel Kant's "lawfulness without law" is the law of the flesh without the law of the father/Father getting in the way. (Immanuel Kant, Critique of Judgment) The law of the flesh is the foundation of the Marxist, socialist, globalist.

"Laws must not fetter human life; but yield to it; they must change as the needs and capacities of the people change." (Karl Marx, Critique of Hegel's 'Philosophy of Right')

Maslow's "Taxonomy of 'felt' needs" establishes social needs, i.e., Marxism, socialism, globalism over and therefore against the father's/Father's authority (which is excluded from the so called taxonomy). If you are more concerned about your child social life, i.e., his or her "felt" 'needs,' i.e., his or her relationship with others, i.e., with the here-and-now than his or her doing right and not wrong according to established commands, rules, facts, and truth, i.e., than where he or she will spend eternity, i.e., than the there-and-then, you are a Marxist, socialist, globalist (at least going in that direction).

"And through covetousness shall they with feigned words make merchandise of you." 2 Peter 2:3

If I can, through dialogue discover what you are lusting after and offer to help you realize it, I "own" you. It is what happened to the woman in the garden in Eden. Once the master facilitator of 'change's seduced the woman into sharing her lust, then 'creating' a "positive," "safe" environment where she could actualized it (setting aside the Fathers authority, i.e., ". . . thou shalt surely die." with his "Ye shall not surely die."), he "owned" her. The same is true for your spouse (if you are married), your children, your boss, your legislators, . . . your minister, etc., in a dialoguing of opinions to a consensus, facilitated, Marxist, socialist, globalist meeting.

"If we have the power or authority to establish the necessary conditions, the predicted behaviors [our potential ability to influence or control the behavior of groups] will follow." "We can choose to use our growing knowledge to enslave people in ways never dreamed of before, depersonalizing them, controlling them by means so carefully selected that they will perhaps never be aware of their loss of personhood." "We know how to change the opinions of an individual in a selected direction, without his ever becoming aware of the stimuli which changed his opinion." "We know how to influence the ... behavior of individuals by setting up conditions which provide satisfaction for needs of which they are unconscious, but which we have been able to determine." We can achieve a sort of control under which the controlled though they are following a code much more scrupulously than was ever the case under the old system, nevertheless feel free. They are doing what they want to do, not what they are forced to do." "By a careful design, we control not the final behavior, but the inclination to behavior—the motives, the desires, the wishes. The curious thing is that in that case the question of freedom never arises." (Carl Rogers, on becoming a person: A Therapist View of Psychotherapy) emphasis added

It is the facilitator of 'change's,' i.e., the Marxist's, socialist's, globalist's agenda to prevent the father's/Father's authority from controlling the outcome of any meeting, so they can lust after the things of the world, removing anyone who gets in the way (including the unborn, elderly, innocent, righteous) without having any sense of guilt.

"Without exception, [children] enter group therapy [the "group grade" classroom] with the history of a highly unsatisfactory experience in their first and most important group—their primary family [the traditional home with parents telling them what they can and can not do]." "What better way to help [the child] recapture the past than to allow him to re-experience and reenact ancient feelings [resentment, hostility] toward parents in his current relationship to the therapist [the facilitator of 'change]? The [facilitator of 'change'] is the living personification of all parental images [takes the place of the parent]. Group [facilitators] refuse to fill the traditional authority role: they do not lead in the ordinary manner, they do not provide answers and solutions [teach right from wrong from established commands, rules, facts, and truth], they urge the group [the children] to explore and to employ its own resources [to dialogue their "feelings," i.e., their desires and dissatisfactions of the 'moment' in the "light" of the current situation, i.e., their desire for "the group" approval (affirmation)]. The group [children] must feel free to confront the [the facilitator of 'change'], who must not only permit, but encourage, such confrontation [rebellion and anarchy]. He [the child] reenacts early family scripts in the group and, if therapy [brainwashing—washing respect for and fear of the father's/Father's authority from the child's brain (thoughts) ] is successful, is able to experiment with new behavior, to break free from the locked family role [submitting to the father's/Father's authority, i.e., doing the father's/Father's will] he once occupied. . . . the patient [the child] changes the past by reconstituting it ['creating' a "new" world order from his "ought," i.e., a world which "lusts," i.e., a world void of the father's/Father's authority and the guilty conscience which the father's/Father's authority engenders for doing wrong, disobeying, sinning, i.e., for "lusting . . ."]." (Irvin D. Yalom, The Theory and Practice of Group Psychotherapy)

In order to prevent the father's/Father's authority establishing policies, rules, and law the "soviet" was developed: a diverse group of people, including the deviant, dialoging their opinions, over social issues, to a consensus, in a facilitated (Marxist, socialist, globalist) meeting, making sure that the father's/Father's authority does not control the outcome, so the facilitator of 'change' (the Marxist, socialist, globalist) can lust without having a guilty conscience, with everyone's affirmation. When you participate in the dialoging of opinions to a consensus process you are affirming the facilitator of 'change's' (the Marxist's, socialist's, globalist's) lusts. This is now the common praxis of the classroom (board meeting, town council, business meeting, etc.).

"Concerning the changing of circumstances by men, the educator must himself be educated." (Karl Marx, Thesis on Feuerbach # 3)

All educators are certified and schools accredited today based upon their use of "Bloom's Taxonomies." i.e., Marxist, socialist, globalist curriculum in the classroom.

In Book 1: Cognitive Domain (Benjamin S. Bloom, Taxonomy of Educational Objectives Book 1: Cognitive Domain) Bloom writes: "We recognize the point of view that truth and knowledge are only relative and that there are no hard and fast truths which exist for all time and places." Benjamin Bloom simply paraphrased Karl Marx's ideology "In the eyes of the dialectic philosophy, nothing is established for all times, nothing is absolute or sacred" (without giving him credit—for obvious reason).

"Bloom's Taxonomies" are ". . . a psychological classification system" used "to develop attitudes and values . . . which are not shaped by the parents." "In fact, a large part of what we call 'good teaching' is the teacher's ability to attain affective objectives through challenging the student's fixed beliefs. . .." "The affective domain is, in retrospect, a virtual 'Pandora's Box.'" (David Krathwohl, Benjamin S. Bloom, Taxonomy of Educational Objectives Book 2: Affective Domain) "Pandora's Box" is a container full of evils, which once opened can not be closed. Once the "lid," i.e., parental authority, i.e., the father's/Father's authority, i.e., fear of judgment is removed it is difficult if not impossible to put it back on again.

As Warren Bennis wrote in his book, The Temporary Society ". . . any intervention between parent and child tend to produce familial democracy regardless of its intent." "The consequences of family democratization take a long time to make themselves felt—but it would be difficult to reverse the process once begun. . . . once the parent can in any way imagine his own orientation to be a possible liability to the child in the world approaching." ". . . Once uncertainty is created in the parent how best to prepare the child for the future, the authoritarian family is moribund, regardless of whatever countermeasures may be taken." "The state, by its very interference in the life of its citizens, must necessarily undermine a parental authority which it attempts to restore." "For however much the state or community may wish to inculcate obedience and submission in the child, its intervention betrays a lack of confidence in the only objects from whom a small child can learn authoritarian submission."

"There is no type of past behavior too deviant for a group to accept once therapeutic group norms are established." (Yalom)

In the facilitated, i.e., Marxist, socialist, globalist classroom the deviant is given voice, making all subject to having to 'justify' (tolerate) his behavior, thus negating the guilty conscience for doing wrong, disobeying, sinning, i.e., for lusting, i.e., making all things adaptable to 'change.'

"The philosophers [parents] have only interpreted the world in different ways [forcing those under their authority to do as they are told], the objective however, is change [the children's natural inclination to lust after that which the world stimulates and hate restraint, i.e., stimulus response being 'justified']." (Karl Marx, Feuerbach Thesis #11) Inscribed on Karl Marx's tomb (so it must be important)—bracketed information not included.

"[We] must develop persons who see non-influencability of private convictions in joint deliberations as a vice rather than a virtue." (Kenneth Benne, Human Relations in Curriculum Change)

"To create effectively a new set of attitudes and values, the individual must undergo great reorganization of his personal beliefs and attitudes and he must be involved in an environment which in many ways is separated from the previous environment in which he was developed. . . . many of these changes are produced by association with peers who have less authoritarian points of view, as well as through the impact of a great many courses of study in which the authoritarian pattern is in some ways brought into question while more rational and nonauthoritarian behaviors are emphasized." "The effectiveness of this new set of environmental conditions is probably related to the extent to which the students are 'isolated' from the home during this period of time." ". . . objectives can best be attained where the individual is separated from earlier environmental conditions and when he is in association with a group of peers who are changing in much the same direction and who thus tend to reinforce each other."* (Book 2: Affective Domain)

*See the issues on Kurt Lewin, Unfreezing, Moving or Changing, Refreezing People, Force Field Analysis, and Group Dynamics; "Unfreezing. This term, also adopted from Lewinian change theory, refers to the process of disconfirming an individual's former belief system." (Yalom) "A successful change includes, therefore, three aspects: unfreezing the present level, moving to the new level, and freezing group life on the new level." (Kurt Lewin) "In brief, unfreezing is the breaking down of the mores, customs and traditions of an individual – the old ways of doing things – so that he is ready to accept new alternatives." (Edger Schein and Warren Bennis, Personal and Organizational Change Through Group Methods: The Laboratory Approach) "Unfreezing" engenders cognitive dissonance. It is the desire for group approval (affirmation) that belief is sacrificed at the altar of self, i.e., lust preservation.

The following section is from a book explaining how the Communist Chinese brainwash their victims through the use of "Lewinian change theory," which is being used in the "group grade," facilitated, "Bloom's Taxonomy" classroom.

"The manner in which the prisoner came to be influenced to accept the Communist's definition of his guilt can best be described by distinguishing two broad phases—(1) a process of 'unfreezing,' in which the prisoner's physical resistance, social and emotional supports, self-image and sense of integrity, and basic values and personality were undermined, thereby creating a state of 'readiness' to be influence; and (2) a process of 'change,' in which the prisoner discovered how the adoption of 'the people's standpoint' and a reevaluation of himself from this perspective would provide him with a solution to the problems created by the prison pressure."
"Most were put into a cell containing several who were further along in reforming themselves and who saw it as their primary duty to 'help' their most backward member to see the truth about himself in order that the whole cell might advance. Each such cell had a leader who was in close contact with the authorities for purposes of reporting on the cell's progress and getting advice on how to handle the Western member . . . the environment undermined the (clients) self-image."
". . . Once this process of self of self re-evaluation began, the (client) received all kinds of help and support from the cell mates and once again was able to enter into meaningful emotional relationships with others." (Interpersonal Dynamics: Essays in Readings on Human Interaction, ed. Warren G. Bennis, Edgar H. Schein, David E. Berlew, and Fred I. Steele)

P.O.W. Major David F. MacGhee wrote "Black is black and white is white. Neither torture, maltreatment nor intimidation can change a fact. To argue the point. . . serves no useful purpose." on his cell wall, responding to the Communist North Korean's attempt to use the above method of brainwashing, i.e., the "group grade" to get him to replace a didactic "right-wrong," truth based paradigm with a dialectical "opinion," i.e., "feelings" based paradigm, making truth ever subject to 'change,' i.e., to whatever "the group" would affirm., i.e., make everyone in "the group" "feel" accepted. (January 19th, 1953)

Group therapy, i.e., the "group grade," facilitated classroom applies the same procedure. "In the group not only must the individual strive for autonomy but the leader must be willing to allow him to do so. . . . an individual's behavior cannot be fully understood without an appreciation of his environmental press. . . . one member's behavior is not understandable out of context of the entire group. . . . there is no more important issue than the interrelationship of the group members. . . . few individuals, as Asch has shown, can maintain their objectivity in the face of apparent group unanimity; and the individual rejects critical feelings toward the group at this time to avoid a state of cognitive dissonance. To question the value or activities of the group, would be to thrust himself into a state of dissonance. Long cherished but self-defeating beliefs and attitudes may waver and decompose in the face of a dissenting majority. One of the most difficult patients for me to work with in groups is the individual who employs fundamentalist religious views in the service of denial. The ‘third force' in psychology . . . which emphasized a holistic, humanistic concept of the person, provided impetus and form to the encounter group . . . The therapist assists the patient to clarify the nature of the imagined danger and then . . . to detoxify, to disconfirm the reality of this danger. By shifting the group's attention from ‘then-and-there' [parental authority] to ‘here-and-now' [their feelings of the 'moment'] material, he performs a service to the group . . . focusing the group upon itself. Members must develop a feeling of mutual trust and respect and must come to value the group as an important means of meeting their personal needs. Once a member realizes that others accept him and are trying to understand him, then he finds it less necessary to hold rigidly to his own beliefs; and he may be willing to explore previously denied aspects of himself. Patients should be encouraged to take risks in the group; such behavior change results in positive feedback and reinforcement and encourages further risk-taking. Members learn about the impact of their behavior on the feelings of other members. . . .a patient might, with further change, outgrow . . . his spouse . . . unless concomitant changes occur in the spouse." (Yalom)

All Bloom did (the Marxist, socialist, globalist does), when it comes to right and wrong behavior was remove the father's/Father's authority from the classroom environment (remove the student's having to do right and not wrong according to established commands, rules, facts, and truth, letting them establish the commands, rules, facts, and truth themselves, i.e., according to their carnal nature, i.e., self interests, i.e., lusts), removing it from the students thoughts, 'justifying' their actions, i.e., their natural inclination to lust after the things of the world, thereby turning them against the father/Father and his/His authority. After explaining it, in brief to a kindergarten teacher, a relative of mine, who uses it in her classroom, her response was "You make me feel wicked. You make me feel like I am doing something wicked." which was the proper response. I rarely hear people be so honest, although I sensed no repentance on her part as she walked away.

"Let the wicked forsake his way, and the unrighteous man his thoughts: and let him return unto the LORD, and he will have mercy upon him; and to our God, for he will abundantly pardon." Isaiah 55:7

The "educator," i.e., the facilitator of 'change,' i.e., the group psychotherapist, i.e., the Marxist, socialist, globalist does not have to tell the students to question, challenge, defy, disregard, attack their parent's authority when they get home from school, if they were not doing that already (telling them would be "old school," maintaining the "old" world order of being told even if it was done for the 'purpose' of 'change,' i.e., for the 'purpose' of creating a "new" world order), all they have to do is use a curriculum in the classroom that "encourages," i.e., pressures the students to participate in dialoguing their opinions to a consensus, 'justifying' their carnal nature, i.e., "lust" over and therefore against their parent's authority. Being told to be "positive" (supportive of the other students carnal nature) and not "negative" (judging them by their parent's standards) pressures students to 'justify' their and the other student's love of (lust for) pleasure and hate of restrain, doing so in order to be approved, i.e., affirmed by "the group," resulting in "the group" labeling those students who, refuse to participate in the process of 'change' or who fight against it as being "negative," divisive, hateful, intolerant, maladjusted, unadaptable to 'change,' resisters of 'change,' not "team players," lower order thinkers, in denial, phobic, prejudiced, judgmental, racist, fascist, dictators, anti-social, etc., i.e., "hurting" people's "feelings" resulting in "the group" rejecting them—the student's natural desire for approval and fear of rejection forces him to participate. The same outcome applies to all adults, in any profession who participate in the process as well. Once you are 'labeled,' you are 'labeled' for life. In the soviet union, once you were 'labeled' "psychological," no matter how important you were in the past, your life was over, your career was done.

"For the wicked boasteth of his heart's desire, and blesseth the covetous, whom the LORD abhorreth. The wicked, through the pride of his countenance, will not seek after God: God is not in all his thoughts." "The transgression of the wicked saith within my heart, that there is no fear of God before his eyes. For he flattereth himself in his own eyes, until his iniquity be found to be hateful. The words of his mouth are iniquity and deceit: he hath left off to be wise, and to do good. He deviseth mischief upon his bed; he setteth himself in a way that is not good; he abhorreth not evil." Psalms 10:3, 4; 36:1-4

Facilitators of 'change,' i.e., psychologists, i.e., behavioral "scientists," i.e., "group psychotherapists," i.e., Marxists (Transformational Marxists)—all being the same in method or formula—are using the dialoguing of opinions to a consensus (affirmation) process, i.e., dialectic 'reasoning' ('reasoning' from/through the students "feelings" of the 'moment,' i.e., from/through their "lust" for pleasure and their hate of restraint, in the "light" of their desire for group approval, i.e., affirmation and fear of group rejection) in the "group grade," "safe zone/space/place," "Don't be negative, be positive," "open ended, non-directed," soviet style, brainwashing (washing the father's/Father's authority from the children's thoughts and actions, i.e., "theory and practice," negating their having a guilty conscience, which the father's/father's authority engenders for doing wrong, disobeying, sinning in the process—called "the negation of negation" since the father's/Father's authority and the guilty conscience, being negative to the child's carnal nature, is negated in dialogue—in dialogue, opinion, and the consensus process there is no father's/Father's authority, i.e., no established aka absolute command, rule, facts, or truth to be accepted as is, by faith and obeyed; there is only the person's carnal desires, i.e., lusts of the past and the present being verbally expressed and 'justified'), inductive 'reasoning' ('reasoning' from/through the students "feelings," i.e., their natural inclination to "lust" after the carnal pleasures of the 'moment'—dopamine emancipation—which the world stimulates, i.e., their "self interest," i.e., their "sense experience," selecting "appropriate information"—excluding, ignoring, or resisting, i.e., rejecting any "inappropriate" information, i.e., established command, rule, fact, or truth that gets in the way of their desired outcome, i.e., pleasure—in determining right from wrong behavior), "Bloom's Taxonomy," "affective domain," French Revolution (Liberté, Égalité, Fraternité) classroom "environment" in order (as in "new" world order) to 'liberate' children from parental authority, i.e., from the father's/Father's authority system (the Patriarchal Paradigm)—as predators, charlatans, pimps, pedophiles, seducing, deceiving, and manipulating them as chickens, rats, and dogs, i.e., treating them as natural resource ("human resource") in order to convert them into 'liberals,' socialists, globalists, so they, 'justifying' their "self" before one another, can do wrong, disobey, sin, i.e., can "lust" after the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' that the world stimulates, with impunity.

Home schooling material, co-ops, conferences, etc., are joining in the same praxis, fulfilling Immanuel Kant's as well as Georg Hegel's, Karl Marx's, and Sigmund Freud's agenda of using the pattern or method of Genesis 3:1-6, i.e., "self" 'justification,' i.e., dialectic (dialogue) 'reasoning," i.e., 'reasoning' from/through your "feelings," i.e., your carnal desires of the 'moment' which are being stimulated by the world (including your desire for approval from others, with them affirming your carnal nature) in order to negate Hebrews 12:5-11, i.e., the father's/Father's authority, i.e., having to humble, deny, die to, control, discipline, capitulate your "self" (your lusts) in order to do the father's/Father's will, negating Romans 7:14-25, i.e., your having a guilty conscience when you do wrong, disobey, sin, thereby negating your having to repent before the father/Father for your doing wrong, disobedience, sins—which is the real agenda.